The article I chose to read and depict was Neil Gorsuch faces the Senate. The reason I chose to do this article is because in class we are currently going over the House of reps. and the senate, as well as the supreme court justice Neil Gorsuch. In the article written by The Editorial Board of the New York Times you cans surely tell that it was written from a democrats point of view and opinion. The article then talks about how Neil is not a good choice or candidate for this position, it also stated that the position should of been filled a year ago by former president Barack Obama's nominee Merrick Garland. After three days of questioning Neil the Democrats began to flake out due them not being able to stump him. It was obviously shown that the questioners were failing to l and any further or serious blows or Gorsuch and began to influence him on his future role in office and not trying to stall or deny his confirmation. In the past justice nominees have shown good potential in being a good justice during being questioned and depicted, the real test will see what happens in action. On this topic and I article I disagree with the fact that he is going to be a bad fit for the new justice. I feel like what he has shown in his speeches and how he has handled being questioned he will make a good fit and be fine. I do think he should become more open minded and not such a strait ticket, being a supreme court justice is very important and many times dealt with people lives.

McCallum Hutchins
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/opinion/neil-gorsuch-faces-the-senate.html?_r=0